• Playlab

Kimi K2

selected

Selected as primary model for production. Best cheap tool calling ability. Requires explicit formatting instructions to match Claude's natural formatting.

Tool Calling Reliability

High - best among cheap models

Strengths

  • Excellent tool calling ability
  • Low cost
  • Good instruction following
  • Rated highly for not hallucinating

Weaknesses

  • Requires explicit formatting instructions
  • Can misinterpret 'GHANA REFERENCES' section as actual references
  • May respond as if it read references even when it didn't
  • Lower variability needed for better performance

Key Notes

  • Tool calls MUST be executed prior to steps where reference content is needed
  • Lower variability improves performance
  • Requires more explicit prompting around formatting than Claude

Analysis

Kimi K2 was selected as the primary model due to its excellent tool calling capabilities at a low cost. However, it requires careful prompt engineering to match Claude's natural formatting. The model has a tendency to respond as if it read references even when tool calls haven't been executed, requiring explicit workflow instructions.

Related Links